In a city with a 29.9% child poverty rate — an individual takes over a night nursery in Naha, 2024

When a small business with no successor changes hands, the deciding factor isn’t always price alone. The business transfer of “Milky Nursery,” a night-shift nursery in a Naha, Okinawa entertainment district, is published as a textbook example of this. The buyer was Masatora Fukumoto, who had only just founded Avant-garde Co. in April 2024. The seller was Milky Way Co., which faced a lack of a successor.

To be upfront: for this deal, neither the transfer price, the nursery’s sales, nor the number of enrolled children is disclosed. There’s no way to verify the fairness of the price with numbers. Still, it’s worth covering because these negotiations went through a near-breakdown before returning to signing, and the reason is spelled out concretely, in the words of the support organization on the seller’s side.

The published facts, lined up

The buyer had gone through activity as a sole proprietor before founding the company, becoming an operator of a childcare facility about half a year after founding it. Rather than opening a new nursery from scratch, this was a choice to take over the existing licensed facility together with its staff and enrolled children.

Why “night-shift” and “Naha”

Fukumoto is based in Fukuoka. Geographic proximity wasn’t why he chose this deal. By his own explanation, he had narrowed his search to the childcare business from the start, registering with both the Okinawa Prefecture Business Succession & Handover Support Center and Batonz, and waiting for a listing.

The reason given for selecting this one is a regional social issue, not the business economics. Okinawa is said to have the highest single-mother rate in the country nationwide, and the nursery he acquired sits in what he describes as “an entertainment district like Kabukicho in Tokyo.” Mothers working night jobs need somewhere to leave their children. That’s what this night-shift nursery provides. Fukumoto says, “If we can make this business viable in this area and change education here, it can be rolled out anywhere in Japan.”

His own upbringing at a Montessori-education nursery in Fukuoka City is also cited as a motive. He also offers this observation from the field about the childcare industry: “The nursery business makes money and is stable, and yet the impression I got is that there are still very few childcare operators focused on education”. This observation became his hypothesis for differentiation.

The move that pulled the deal back from the brink

The moment the trajectory of this deal changed is clear. Negotiations, conducted mainly online, hit a wall due to a misunderstanding.

Hidehiko Sato, the general manager of the Okinawa Prefecture Business Succession & Handover Support Center, revealed the state of things at the time: “We were on the verge of the negotiation falling apart.” As for what turned it back toward signing, what he cites isn’t an additional term or a price negotiation. It’s this: “Thanks to the buyer going out of his way to come all the way to Okinawa to meet in person, the misunderstanding was resolved, and I was relieved that the transfer went through safely.”

Fukumoto, on the buyer’s side, describes the same scene this way: “When there was a gap in communication with the other side, I went with the nursery director directly to meet the owner in person. There are things that just can’t be conveyed by phone or in writing, and it’s also important to grasp what the seller is feeling.” It’s easy to overlook that he brought the nursery director along, meaning he had the person who would actually run the site after the handover meet the seller directly.

In other words, the sequence explained is: near-breakdown → direct visit to Okinawa → signing, all in one line. The travel cost from Fukuoka to Okinawa is negligible relative to the scale of the deal, but in this case it turned out to be the branching point.

What worked wasn’t passion — it was the design of “time”

A story of a misunderstanding resolving through a face-to-face meeting is easily consumed as a heartwarming tale. But looking at the structure of this deal, the factor that was actually at work sits one level below that.

Regarding the reason the support center introduced Batonz, Sato states it plainly: it was “time.” The selling company’s cash flow was tight. Indeed, he assessed the process this way: “They responded quickly from application to the listing article going up, buyer candidates emerged early, and negotiations were proceeding smoothly.”

The dynamic that can be read from this is as follows. The seller had no time to spare, and couldn’t leave the listing on the market for long. That means it’s faster for the buyer to move forward by giving the seller conviction that “this is someone I can entrust it to,” rather than hammering out fine details of terms first. Online exchange is fast as a means of transmitting information, but it isn’t well suited to generating that kind of conviction. What made the inefficient act of flying from Fukuoka to Okinawa effective was that it functioned as a signal, the buyer bearing the cost of generating that conviction.

Sato’s comment, “I think the young buyer’s drive and his deep passion for childcare struck a chord with the seller’s heart”, looks like it’s about emotion, but it’s actually identifying who the real decision-maker was. In a business succession at the scale of a few employees, even if the seller is a company, the person actually deciding is an individual, and that individual has room to choose a counterpart for reasons beyond price.

The limits of a story with no numbers disclosed

At the same time, it’s too early to read this case as a “success story.” What’s published is up through signing, not the results afterward.

Because the transfer price isn’t disclosed, there’s no way to discuss return on investment. Enrolled-child count, staff count, sales, and profit are all unpublished, so whether the business is in the black isn’t something outsiders can judge. The description that the seller’s cash flow was tight suggests, if anything, that the business inherited may not have been in a financially comfortable state.

Furthermore, the value the buyer is pursuing is “renewing the educational content”. This isn’t a short-term profitability measure. Fukumoto himself says, “First, over three years, my goal is to solidify the business model and educational content, and establish the Believe House style,” with multi-location expansion and educational consulting spoken of as concepts for further down the line. What’s verified as of now is only that “the handover succeeded”, whether it’s “actually running well” lies outside the published information.

The location has two sides as well. The condition of being in an entertainment district where demand for night-shift childcare is concentrated means fewer competitors and a higher degree of being needed, but it also sits right next to a constraint, the paying capacity of the user base. The background statistic of a 29.9% poverty rate is both a validation of social significance and, at the same time, an explanation of why it’s a market where it’s hard to raise unit prices.

How far this approach can be copied

What’s easy to reproduce is the narrowing of the search and the handling of a stalled negotiation. The procedure of limiting your industry to childcare and registering with both a public support organization and an M&A platform to wait can be carried out regardless of the size of one’s capital. The judgment to go on-site when negotiations stall, and to bring the operations lead along to meet the seller directly, is the same.

What’s hard to reproduce lies in the premises. Fukumoto had worked at a company operating employer-led nurseries before this acquisition. He had seen the industry from the inside. From the seller’s perspective, the buyer candidate who showed up wasn’t an industry outsider but someone who knew the field. On top of that, the seller’s cash-flow pressure is a time constraint the buyer can’t manufacture, an external factor that made the terms favorable. Bringing the same passion to another deal where the seller has time to spare, a direct visit might well not be the deciding factor.

And the biggest limitation is that this case tells us nothing at all about the fairness of the price. With the transfer price undisclosed, the single most wanted piece of information, “how much can you buy a facility of this scale for”, can’t be obtained from this account. What can be referenced is only the design of the process leading to signing.

Related reading

• How MENTA was acquired by Lancers — a domestic sale case of an individual-developed service being taken over by a company.
• A record of launching a kitchen car in four months — a case tracking the initial cost and ramp-up of someone starting small, in numbers.